Florida Gov Joins obama Lawyers To Battle Birthers

The Miami Herald gave a fairly balanced report on the ballot challenge brought by Michael Voeltz (registered Dem) against barack Hussein obama. 

I’ll post a screenshot, and include the link to the full article.  WND has an article up as well.

It has been brought to my attention that there is no box to leave comments on this post.  I will contact WordPress for a fix – 6/20  

FIXED

http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/06/18/2855160/florida-judge-hearing-obama-ballot.html#storylink=cpy

click to enlarge

The Miami Herald 6/18/12

So, the attorneys for obama and the FL Dept. of State, argue two things.  One is that obama HAS NOT YET BEEN NOMINATED for this upcoming (re) election.  So, since he hasn’t been nominated, he can’t be held to the requirement of someone who has.  Get it?  Next is that “federal law precludes state courts from determining the qualifications of presidential candidates.” 

Larry has argued, “Florida’s election statutes provide broad protections for voters to ensure that the integrity of the election system is beyond reproach. One of the laws allows voters to challenge the nomination of a candidate who is not eligible for the office he is seeking.”

So obama lawyers say that obama isn’t OFFICIALLY nominated (yet) and therefore this question of whether or not he is ineligible can’t be heard.  Add to that, the state of FL, in fact not a single state in this country, has a RIGHT to challenge a nominated candidates eligibility.

The question that hangs in the air, like a big fat pink elephant, is that if “Congress” fails to act, or flat out refuses to act on proof of obamas ineligibility, what recourse can there be? 

Are we expected to believe that nothing at all can be done?

Advertisements

~ by ladysforest on June 18, 2012.

8 Responses to “Florida Gov Joins obama Lawyers To Battle Birthers”

  1. Do you have my email?

  2. Breaking News: John Dummett and Van Irion’s Liberty Legal Foundation Tennessee Obama Ballot Challenge Dismissed

    http://birtherheadlines.blogspot.com/2012/06/dummett-obama-ballot-challenge.html

    • The Tennessee Democrats gave Obama a vote of zero confidence in that decision. It says:

      “Defendants assert that the Tennessee Democratic Party has the right to nominate whoever it chooses to run as a candidate, including someone who is not qualified for the office.”

      IOW, this means they don’t think they can prove Obama is Constitutionally eligible for office, otherwise, why make such an argument??

      • True. However, can they make such a nomination if in doing so they knowingly nominate someone who does not qualify under the LAW? These organizations know full well that the majority of the voters place trust in them to advance a candidate that at least meets the legal requirements. The average voter won’t even check into that because they fully believe that this is required to be done by the party.

        Look at how the whole meme against “Birthers” got started. The larger part of the population ASSUMED that obama had been vetted at the very least as to something as ordinary as turning over his birth certificate. I personally couldn’t believe it when I heard he had not. I couldn’t believe that in this country we didn’t have strict regulations to follow – especially for the President. That’s how I became a Birther.

        Now when the issue is brought to a politician, and to the self-satisified progressive obot, they tell you that if you don’t like it you’ll have to vote.

        So our vote is the thing is it? We are the ones to blame are we? Our votes got us a unvetted, ineligible commie fuktard and his scrunt of a wife in the White House. OUR votes did this.

        The peoples vote is responsible – yet the people have NO STANDING.

        We have no recourse to address a wrong that was knowingly perpetrated on us. This is what we are discovering. This ridicule that is aimed at us may be, in part, to hide that fact from the average person. To confuse the issue and close the conversation before people understand the real underlying danger. Before the average person sees the truth.

        • Individual voters do not have standing (yes they should), but a class action suit would fly.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: