A Pidgeons Eye View
Had a post sitting in “draft”, it disappeared when I tried to edit the title. Let’s try again.
Kittens, I am almost at a loss.
Lately it has seemed that we who follow this mystery, called “The Birthers”, have retreated a bit from the mystery tour .
I’d say it began right about when Donald Trump entered the arena. We sort of got into the back seat to watch where he wanted to travel, and let him put the pedal to the medal. We admired his gumption, and his masterful way of plowing down the media’s blockade of derisive dismissal of all things “Birther”. Then his machine skidded out on a greasy patch of forgery that we had warned him to expect. He rolled up into a correspondents event, where his skills to maneuver the focus and advance the dialog failed, and he crashed into the Presidential teleprompters. Lucky he was wearing his hair helmet.
We climbed out of the back seat in disgust. Pissed that our warning had been ignored. Pissed that he failed to own up to skidding out on an obvious forgery. Pissed that we were now worse off than we had been before, AND we had to eat untasty Trump crow.
It don’t taste like chicken.
And now we have been covered in Pidgeon shit.
Let me back up a sec. For me, it always comes down to the natural born Citizen (nbC) eligibility issue. So, you think he was born in HI? Daddy was a Brit, obama was born a dual citizen that was subject to Sr.s Brit citizenship. Born in Kenya? not nbC. Born in Canada? not nbC.
The closest obama comes to being nbC are these theories that Davis or Malcom X was the daddy. That would work IF one of them was the dad and obama was born on US soil – lets presume HI since he seems to want to make that claim.
How in hell can you prove either of those two theories? It is no stretch at all to believe your dad is who you are told it is. Nothing wrong or strange there. With obama’s commie streak, don’t you think he would have welcomed learning his dad was one of those two? Especially if it happened while he was young and it could have easily been worked into his nativity? I think obama might have been glad to learn that, say, Malcom X was sperm donor #1. Imagine the instant elevation from goat herder Kenyan to a mover and shaker like X. So X didn’t parent him – neither did Sr. So X didn’t claim him – Sr. kinda did, but not really. Obama went to Kenya looking for the connection AFTER his daddy Sr. had croaked – but not before………
Now we have Stephen Pigeon rolling out some new theory that this cat called obama ain’t even the one who has the three or four different dads and was born in HI/Kenya/Canada/WA/Indonesia. Nope, now obama is someone altogether different. He is now some dude who was named Barak Mounir Ubayd, and got his name changed TO Barack Hussien obama in some town of less than 100 residents in BC. AND at the same time we have Leo Donofrio suggesting a new and improved way for obama’s lawyers to defend him. Both men are attorneys. Both are popular among the “birthers”.
What is that old saying? Keep your friends close, keep your enemies closer.
I am happy to find that in the comment threads the latest theory is not enjoying a great deal of acceptance.
Look – the fact is that there is a “barack Hussein obama” entered on Stanley Ann’s early passport. The fact is that he is listed as “barack Hussein obama” on the Indonesian school record. The fact is that even Kenyan officials claim that obama is the son of Obama Sr. (and yes, some have said he was born in Kenya). Obama Sr. is the father UNLESS or until real contemporaneous documents are discovered and verified to be genuine. Then you’d have to get a DNA test also.
Do we really want to go down into these rabbit holes? Do we really want to turn away from genuine proven research and facts at hand to chase some new theory that is very implausible at best?
What do we gain? What happens if you are willing to run towards every new theory put out there? You look desperate and gullible and you shall be dismissed as such. Count on it.
Here is a snip from a good comment left on the ObamaReleaseYourRecords blog, written by AuntieMadder:
Maybe they’re trying to change the narrative so that Barky becomes a natural born citizen. Or maybe the intent is to create confusion, distraction and more ridicule of the “crazy birfers and their conspiracy theories.”
For what it’s worth, I’m not accusing Attorney Pidgeon of being a propagandist. He could be the victim of disinformation passed on to him. The timing of his book’s release to coincide with Corsi’s book, however, doesn’t make Pidgeon look good. Either he’s intentionally attempting to confuse facts with disinformation or he’s trying to cash in on Corsi’s and WND’s marketing of Corsi’s book. Either option lends credibility to those who say that Pidgeons are nothing more than flying rodents.
Proof exists somewhere in writing, I’m willing to bet, of the exact meaning and definition known to the drafters and signers of our Constitution, of “natural born Citizen”. Our people are finding such things, just not exactly what we need yet.
Stay the course friends.