Cliven Can’t Haz Cows

•April 11, 2014 • 4 Comments



By now you may have heard about the standoff in Nevada, on a cattle ranch, between our Federal government and the owner of the ranch, Mr. Cliven Bundy.

Sadly this is such a votive situation that it may end horribly – as in Ruby Ridge or Westboro Baptist – HA! I meant fricken WACO – horribly.  sorry for the mix up, heh

Only this time the government isn’t hiding it’s “motive” behind stories that paint the targeted citizens as a danger to society – but instead as a danger to the desert turtle.  And they have all but dropped that pretense as they have converged on Mr. Bundy’s ranch and his family.

Turns out the “endangered turtle” had lost it’s funding some time back, and in the interest of saving some cash while opening up that turtle territory for exploitation, the government which swore to protect these turtles have been KILLING them instead. Yes, that is the truth.  So now they move against the Bundy ranch without the turtle as a shield and so their naked greed and murderous intentions are laid clear.

The few “news” outlets that have reported on this, Fox in particular, have done so without full understanding of the background regarding the decades long fight the Bundy’s have experienced. Fox in particular has been pretty ridiculous in turning this into a debate between the “feel-good” side of the Citizen v. The Governmant, and the fact that the Bundy’s haven’t paid the BLM (Bureau of Land Management) a grazing fee for many years – so The Government is well within it’s rights to stop Mr. Bundy from grazing cattle on the public land according to the pretty lady on Fox.

As is almost always the case there is much more to it than just the two sides in that example debate.  I found a comment in a thread on the Weasel Zippers blog and it contains a statement from one of the Bundy daughters which explains pretty clearly the facts of the decades long fight with our overreaching and greedy government.  It also gives insight into the potential motive behind the aggression towards the Bundy’s.

Think about the fact that the head of the BLM is newly appointed, and see how the newbie is so heavy handed.  Pay attention to how Harry Reid treats the situation as one of no consequence although he has been very involved in the whole turtle shuck and jive.

Now hear the back story of the fees and the Bundy Ranch, H/T Sam1247:

Statement from Shirlee Bundy-
“I have had people ask me to explain my dad’s stance on this BLM fight. Here it is in as simple of terms as I can explain it. There is so much to it, but here it is in a nut shell.

My great-grandpa bought the rights to the Bunkerville allotment back in 1887 around there. Then he sold them to my grandpa who then turned them over to my dad in 1972. These men bought and paid for their rights to the range and also built waters, fences and roads to assure the survival of their cattle, all with their own money, not with tax dollars. These
rights to the land use are called preemptive rights. Somewhere down the line, to keep the cows from over grazing, came the bureau of land management. They were supposed to assist the ranchers in the management of their ranges while the ranchers paid a yearly allotment which was to be used to pay the BLM wages and to help with repairs and improvements
of the ranches. My dad did pay his grazing fees for years to the BLM until they were no longer using his fees to help him and to improve.

Instead they began using these money’s against the ranchers. They bought all the rest of the ranchers in the area out with their own grazing fees. When they offered to buy my dad out for a (pittance) he said “no thanks”, and then fired them because they weren’t doing their job. He quit paying the BLM but, tried giving his grazing fees to the county, which
they turned down. So my dad just went on running his ranch and making his own improvements with his own equipment and his own money, not taxes.

In essence the BLM was managing my dad out of business. Well, when buying him out didn’t work, they used the endangered species card.  You’ve already heard about the desert tortoise. Well that didn’t work either, so then began the threats and the court orders, which my dad has proven to be unlawful for all these years. Now they’re desperate. It’s come down to buying the brand inspector off and threatening the County Sheriff. Everything they’re doing at this point is illegal and totally
against the constitution of the United States of America. Now you may be saying,” how sad, but what does this have to do with me?” Well, I’ll tell you. They will get rid of Cliven Bundy, the last man standing on the Bunkerville allotment and then they will close all the roads so no one can ever go on it again. Next, it’s Utah’s turn. Mark my words, Utah is next.

Then there’s the issue of the cattle that are at this moment being stolen. See even if dad hasn’t paid them (the BLM), those cattle do belong to him. Regardless where they are they are my fathers property. His herd has been part of that range for over a hundred years, long before the BLM even existed. Now the Feds think they can just come in and remove
them and sell them without a legal brand inspection or without my dad’s signature on it. They think they can take them over two boarders, which is illegal, ask any trucker. Then they plan to take them to the Richfeild Auction and sell them. All with our tax money. They have paid off the contract cowboys and the auction owner as well as the Nevada brand inspector with our tax dollars. See how slick they are? Well, this is it in a nut shell. Thanks”

So is it silly for me to point out that any remaining desert torti are likely smashed flat as a cow pie from all the government vehicles driving over their delicate environment?  Erph.  Is it unsettling that the Feds have a BACKHOE going in there amongst other equipment – like dump trucks?  You DON’T load cattle in dump trucks to be transported, most especially with a backhoe – not unless they are dead first.  How will the cows get dead?  Why are the Feds planning on transporting dead cows?  Do they have a right to KILL the cattle?  And as Mrs. Bundy (?) pointed out  – the herds are being separated, and the little baby cows are being left alone in the scorching heat.  They will quickly die without the mother cow.

And the local law, the Governor, the elected officials of Nevada all kick at the dirt, while taking no stand, without asserting sovereignty of the State or local government/citizenry.  Whoop – I am wrong, for Mr. Harry Reid, NV Senator, did weigh in on the matter:



Auntie Dies On Our Dime

•April 8, 2014 • 1 Comment

About Damn Time


Screenshot, click to enlarge: link to full article is below image

o's aunt croaks

Read full article at The Washington Times

Frankly, I think she was in more danger being in close proximity to her loving nephew.


H/T Marshman2

Screenshot, click to enlarge : link to full article is below image


Link to The Kenyan Daily Post

Did you catch that last sentence?  Ole Mama Sarah – who is being heavily guarded at the expense of the U.S., even though she has actually NO RELATION  to obama, hopes that Odingo can get the skanky body of Auntie sent to Kenya.  Sure, he can get her sent, no problem, if he wants to pay for it.  I’m betting we go on the hook for her disposal in Kenya also. 

Fraudulent Certificate Gives Birth To Disconcerting Discoveries

•February 8, 2014 • 5 Comments


Sheriff Arpaio’s Lead Obama Investigator Drops Bombs On White House – 2/7/2014


QUICK UPDATE: H/T Gordo and the commenters at WTPOTUS:

CDR Kerchner (Ret)’s Blog:

“Breaking News: Is Google Obama’s New IRS? Google Takes Down #1 “Birther” Site,, Alleging Violations of TOS – Puts Up Instead Warnings Claiming it is a Cyber Attack Site and/or a Malware/Badware Infected Site. Cuts off AdSense Advertising Revenue Generating Privileges! The site has been operating for years. Warning that the site is a Cyber Attack site and infected with Malware or Badware are all untrue per the site owner who inspects and screens his site regularly to prevent such things.”

“I have spoken today with the owner of the and he tells me to tell my readers to bookmark that URL and that the site should be back up in a couple days on another venue. He asks you to be patient. …”

.Below is a pared down, “snips” transcript of the conversation between Carl Gallops and Mike Zullo, from just the first 12 minutes of the full recording which is posted below in a YouTube video. My keen observations are sprinkled throughout. I pulled just the “important and pertinent” parts of the questions and answers for you:

Gallops: “Give a general overview for the uninformed.”

Zullo:  “As an outgrowth during investigation, you get other information,and other information surfaced as a result of this birth certificate investigation, that has prompted Sheriff Aripio to open a second investigation – and this is a criminal investigation, into other matters that I (Zullo) am not privileged to discuss.  When the sheriffs office is finished – it (the findings) will be compelling, mind blowing, they will be disconcerting.

ME: In other words, nothing concrete on the birth issue, but rather something else connected to obama, which may appear to be very shady, inappropriate, unseemly, but likely NOT illegal.

Gallops: No date set, and March could be moved back.  My understanding is that recently you guys uncovered more stuff, and it might even be a little delayed, if you guys keep finding more and more heavy duty stuff, am I anywhere near right on that?

ME: So, the expectation has been set that March will NOT be the time frame for the big reveal.  Well, I think most of us rather anticipated that.

Zullo:  Sheriff Arpaio has dedicated two full time Maricopa Co. Sheriffs office Detectives, seasoned pros that are working this, these are the guys that go hunting down the really bad guys.

ME: He goes on to say that there may be actually two different press events – one being a presser focusing on the fact of the fraudulent birth document.  SO again I note that he does not imply that the information contained on the released “long form birth certificate” is incorrect or fraudulent, but that the document itself certainly is, and can be proved fraudulent.

Gallops:  Sounds like wisdom in dealing with the two topics separately, as you bring these things forward, cause even though the birth certificate issue is I think, huge, perhaps criminal, your investigation into that led into all these other avenues, really did open up two (separate) branches of investigations that are deeply criminal, and we know that for sure now, and so it may set better with the public, and be more palatable, if if you do present them each separately.

Zullo: Work on the birth certificate goes on – absorbed by the (cold case) Posse organization, and I am assisting on the criminal investigation,with Maricopa Co. Sheriff Detectives, thats the way its going to be, Sheriff Arpaio felt that this was the best way, to utilize resources, and asked me if I would assist going forward, and it’s not going to be clear to the listening public till they understand the whole picture.

Gallops:  When you “get to” the birth certificate issue, that’s really a done deal.  All of the people out there who have been marginalized, as birthers, (here he rambles and stresses that this comment is ONLY about those who are mocked for thinking the White House released birth certificate is not up to snuff, and NOT those who question where obama was born, as Zullo has not investigated anything along those lines) will be vindicated.

Zullo:  The birth certificate matter will be concluded the day the sheriff decides to make the announcement.
This is still ongoing, but I can tell you, that if I was a betting man, I would bet the farm – (ahh – he may be BUYING the farm if he actually found anything to derail obama) that the revealed outcome is going to be that that thing (BC)was fraudulently created, for the intent and purpose to defraud.

ME: They would have to have something, in my humble opinion, to PROVE that obama HIMSELF set out to defraud the public with that released certificate.  In other words, he would have to be found to have purposefully instructed people to create it with  fraud in mind.

Gallops: ~ Tells how Orly posted a letter that she claims was written by him (Gallops).  “It is a fraudulent letter”, said Gallops. The letter tells Orly to “stand down”, and that Gallops was the representative of Zullo and Arpaio.

ME:  Don’t believe all that you see on Orlys site.  I NEVER visit there myself.  She’s quixotic.

Zullo: The letter was a fraud. We commend Orly for doing her thing with her own investigation.  We are not connected to Orly at all.  As it is, I have no duty to turn anything over to Orly, no duty to turn anything over to anyone except Sheriff Joe.

Gallops:  And he will turn it over to the world when it’s right.

Zullo: Right

ME: I seem to hear the theme from the Beverly Hillbillies playing in the background…………………

12:45 -

The accompanying article on ObamaReleaseYourRecords, linked to The Post & Email :

Gallups greeted Zullo by saying that he had been “immersed in alligators” since Zullo’s last appearance on the show in November of last year.  Release of the audio of the interview is credited to ORYR.

During the 8:35 segment, Zullo announced that Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has opened a “second criminal investigation” relative to the investigation into the birth certificate image posted on the White House website in April 2011.

The posse began its investigation into the image in September 2011, which publicly declared on March 1, 2012 that it was a “computer-generated forgery.”

Zullo had announced in November that new information would be released in March, but today, he said that “more information” which is “very intense” has been gathered.  Zullo added that because of the new information and second criminal investigation, there might be “two events” held in the future to discuss the two topics separately.

The first, as described by Zullo, would release information which would prove “hands down” that the birth certificate image is a forgery, while the second would cover the second investigation.

Gallups stated that the March release date might change because additional evidence continues to be gathered.

Zullo said that “seasoned professionals” are working on the investigation while his work on the birth certificate forgery continues. He said that when Arpaio decides to make his revelations public, he will prove that the birth certificate was created “with the intent and purpose to defraud.”

Gallups indicated, as he has previously, that he is privy to some of the information gathered by the investigation which has not yet been made public.  He stated that those who have ridiculed those sensing that something was wrong with the birth certificate image as “birthers” have been “vindicated.”

Gallups asked if such a crime had ever been committed against the American people before, to which Zullo said “no.”

As stated in November, Zullo confirmed that the revelations will be “universe-shattering.”

Source link. © 2014, The Post & Email. All rights reserved.

Beware The Ides Of March Mr. Obama

•January 17, 2014 • 5 Comments


The “obama Fraud Case”, being doggedly pursued by lead investigator,  Mike Zullo, is apparently gearing up for a UNIVERSE SHATTERING release of information in March of this year. Both Zullo and Sheriff Arpaio have already proclaimed the White House  approved version of the obama long form birth certificate to be a complete and utter fraud. 

I believe that they mean the version we saw online is a fraudulent document, but they have NOT, to my knowledge, stated that the information contained on that “birth certificate” is proven – so, documented – to be fraudulent.

But hey, obama has plausible denial working for him.  He “ordered” it released, presumably over the phone.  Some lackey in HI made the copy.  Some attorneys flew to HI and collected it.  Some media chick looked at it and declared it real.  And some White House lackey uploaded a scanned copy to the internet.  obama never touched it. 

So, here is the latest breathless update from Carl Gallops at Freedom Friday, courtesy of Birther Report.  I have provided a full transcript below the video.  Let me know what you think of this.


“Want to do this, I want to give you a quick Mike Zullo update.  As you know, I speak with Mike Zullo, the lead investigator, of the Sheriff Joe Arpaio “Obama Fraud Case”, I speak with him almost every day, as a matter of fact today I have not spoken with him at all, so that’s why I say almost.  But yesterday I was on the phone with him for an hour, and the day before that I was on the phone with him, etc.  So almost every day.  Uh, Mike Zullo wants me to tell you, and I’m I’m, I’m at liberty to say this, that uh, the case is very intense right now.  He is still traveling a lot. This thing broke wide open some months back, you remember the birth certificate issue has been settled.  It is a one hundred percent fraudulent forgery fabrication.   They’ve got all the documented evidence to prove it.  There’s nothing to stand in the way of that.   That’s going to come out and that’s a huge deal.  It’s a huge deal to me.

But, it’s nothing, nothing, compared to what Zullo and Arpaio now have in documented form.  Let me put it like this, Zullo’s words were, “What we now have is universe shattering”.  Yeah, now no one has described Benghazi as universe shattering, as horrible as Benghazi is, as horrible as the IRS scandal, and the NSA spying, and  on and on.   This – I know what they have – and it is universe shattering.  I mean, even if American media decides they’re gonna ignore it the world media will not.  This, when they bring this forward,  it will go around the world. 

I do believe, I do believe, they’re planning on releasing this information in March folks.  And I’m sure you’ll hear most of the  first release of it right here on Freedom Friday and on PP Simmons.  And, of course in major media all over the world, but, I’m telling you, ah, you need to stay tuned to this. “

Ides Of March notes …..

Intentions Haz Consequences

•January 4, 2014 • Leave a Comment



I am aware that the topic has been beaten to hell and back, and still neither side will give.  But the one thing all sides seem to agree on is that there is more than one type of citizenship.

At what point does one become a citizen of any particular country?

1) At birth.

2) Upon naturalization.

However, there is a third way – but only for a very few countries including the United States.  I refer to dual-citizenship/dual nationality.  While this obviously does occur “at birth”, it is now rife with restrictions and regulations requiring certain activities be preformed by the parent/parents of that child.  If those activities are not preformed by the U.S. citizen parent, the childs U.S. citizenship may/will be in jeopardy.  This is a concern only in citizenship by statute.

Such citizenship by statute did not exist at the time the Constitution was ratified of course. It came into being at the passing of a particular Act by Congress using the power given by the Constitution to regulate naturalization and the DATE of that Act is 1790.  The Constitutional requirements for President were never amended to include citizenship by statute – no, not even the Fourteenth Amendment did such. Yet here is how the progressive left, and those that wish to advance Cruz to the Presidency choose to view the controversy:

What is often overlooked by Birthers is that the qualifications for being a citizen at birth when born outside of the U.S. are actually set by law in Congress. And these change over time. At one point dual citizenship may have been a disqualification for automatic American citizenship, but it certainly hasn’t been that way for the timeframe relevant to the birth of modern candidates.

~sorry, I cannot recall the author of the above quote, but if you recognize this as your own, leave a comment and I will credit this as yours~ Ladysforest

There is the simpleton assumption that the same evolving specifications for naturalizing a citizen would also automatically “update” the Presidential eligibility requirements laid out in Art ll, Section 1, Clause 5. Ya know, The Living Constitution argument.

One intent of the Act of 1790 was to allow that a child born to citizen parents while traveling in foreign climes shall not be an alien in the parents own country upon their return.  It was understood at that time that a man might need to be away for perhaps a period of years on matters of business, and while conducting that business may have children born into his family during those years.  The U.S. family may have traveled overseas to visit with family, and such trips were arduous undertakings back then, leading to long stays in the host country.

In fact, when the Act of 1790 was passed it included language specifically for the reason of giving United States citizen parents peace of mind that the child born over the seas would hold legal U.S. citizenship.  The catch was that the father had to have been a U.S. citizen resident – having had to reside in the U.S., although I do not find specifics on the length of time, etc.. The law did not address persons who left the U.S. to follow foreign spouses about or to live free of particular U.S. laws.

” Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States:”

It follows then that the father had to be a resident of a particular state.  The mothers citizenship followed her husbands, as was the general thing back then.  It certainly was at the time this Act was passed.

Which leads to a small point that I would like to make in regards to children who hold U.S. dual citizenship through a parent – but did not reside in the United States for a number of years after being born in a foreign country.

The traditional understanding used to be that to be a U.S. citizen, it naturally follows one must be a resident of a state.  Yep..

“That any Alien being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof on application to any common law Court of record in any one of the States wherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at least,” ~ 1790

A person seeking naturalization had to have been resident in a State for a period of time before he/she could apply.  A person seeking naturalization could not be unattached to any State, or simply put, be a United States citizen at large within the country but having no residence in any particular State.

The naturalization process, or more specifically, processing, takes place at the State level.  Let us consider the thing in common sense terms.  One might say, alright, – George Romney was born in Mexico, but his parents were United States citizens who had never renounced their citizenship, hence he was a stateless U.S. citizen whose citizenship was bestowed on him through his parents by an Act of Congress.  He most certainly did not live in this country in the early years of his life, was not born here, but is held now to have the same status as a person born on the soil or territory of the US?  For those arguing in favor of Ted Cruz, the answer is yes.  Not only did the condition of citizenship pass to Romney, and to Cruz, but it seems to follow that which ever State the parent formerly was a citizen of is also handed down to the child.  To be clear though, I have not yet found the laws that specifically bestows State citizenship in such a way, nor even implies it.

But what we have found is that in the Naturalization act are strict requirements on renouncing ones allegiance to the foreign ties of ones cast-off home country.  So, to become a naturalized citizen, you are absolutely not allowed DUAL citizenship, it being strictly required that you give up all legal ties to your homeland. However, as a statutory citizen born to a US parent, in a foreign country, never living in the U.S. until years have passed, you ARE allowed to be both a citizen of the U.S. and of a foreign country simultaneously.

United States Congress, “An act to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization” (March 26, 1790).

What do you see in the title of this Act?  The word “Naturalization”.  Under that word it is specified;

“And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens: “

Shall be considered as ~ rather than, ‘are natural born Citizens?

Does that not make the child a naturalized citizen? Born a citizen due to a statute written in a Naturalization Act?

Of course people do point out the phrase “natural born Citizen”, and say that as George Washington signed this into law it is proof that a person  could be both born out of this country and be a natural born Citizen.  George knew about it and approved it so it MUST be the same thing they clamor. But, at the same time they are unwilling to concede that the citizenship of the Father then, must also be considered a litmus test for the U.S. citizenship of the child, and it could not descend otherwise.  That’s when the Living Constitution gets mixed in again.  That particular phrase was deleted when the Act was repealed and replaced a mere five years later.  The Congress fixed up the law by making it much more specific on the procedures regarding naturalization and the “natural born Citizen” phrase was changed thus:

“and the children of citizens of the United States, born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, shall be considered as citizens of the United States:   Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons, whose fathers have never been resident of the United States:”

And just so that we are clear – George Washington was still in office in 1795.

So. Children born to parents who ran away from U.S. laws they didn’t like, but did not renounce their citizenship.  Those parents move their children back to the U.S. to escape danger due to war.  Woman married to a foreign national moves off to a country neither are citizens of, and does general work there until her marriage fails.  Brings her Canadian/U.S. dual national child to the U.S. to rebuild her life.

If neither family had encountered those difficulties it is likely those children would have grown up in the countries where they were born.  One Mexican, one Canadian, both stateless U.S. citizens at large.

Twas The Night Before Christmas

•December 24, 2013 • 4 Comments

For the child that lives inside us  ……………..


Empty Suit Makes Empty Gesture

•December 24, 2013 • Leave a Comment

From Weasel Zippers

Obama Tried To Sign Up For Obamacare Using Exchange Website But System Didn’t Recognize Him…

Of course his “enrollment” is nothing but a sham to begin with since his health care is covered by the military.

“We learned today from the White House. Initially, they said he signed up for what they called a bronze plan, paying about four hundred dollars a month in premiums. But, then they came back to us and said – Wait, he didn’t actually enroll. They said his staff did it and that’s because of his unique circumstance as Commander in Chief. That his personal information is not in particular government data bases. So could not actually verify his identity, oddly enough… So his staff did it.”

Because for some reason, the type of information that already exists in the public, specifically: obama’s social security number, income tax returns, signature, passport, and “long form” birth certificate, aren’t enough to enable some random staffers to symbolically enroll obama.  The general public has more access to obama’s personal data than the government data bases do?  


The hell you say.

Obama IRS tax form

Obama IRS tax form






Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.